C51 consultation

 Today the first drop-ins started for the consultation of the C51 scheme, Hamilton Terrace section.  Traffic engineers were present along with City of Westminster highways engineers.

 A trickle of vocal residents came in.  Some have legitimate concerns, some not so much.  Like the idea that the majority of people who responded to a previous consultation were against.  That is not how it works.  All that proves is that you have social capital and are able to mobilise numbers of people motivated enough to object.  Some of the reasons: like pedestrian safety, indicate that people have been reading too much right wing newspapers with talking points claiming that cyclists are dangerous.

 

This is not just a bike lane.  It also comes with improvements to lighting.  The avenue of trees makes many parts of the Hamilton Terrace area in the shadows at night time, even when there are no leaves, the branches are thick.

 

I believe that Hamilton Terrace is the obvious candidate for a low- traffic neighbourhood.  It has a high volume of traffic particularly at peak times.  Much of it is probably through-traffic that could be on the A5 (Maida Vale).  This would make the street (Street) quiet, so that people can talk to each other, or hear other hazards going on around them and safely react.  Quiet ways used to be designated and this would have been one.

 


One legitimate concern we all have is the traffic lights, which are TfL controlled.  I believe a cycle phase would solve the problems of cyclists not obeying the lights.  If the cycle goes green seconds before the car green light, that solves the problem of vans not obeying the advance stop line (known as bike box).  This is because vans have a blind spot and might miss vulnerable road users at a junction.

 


Going back to the modal filters, I would like to see how this would work.  Hamilton Terrace is obviously going to be an expensive scheme.  Modal filters would provide a revenue stream to make it financially sustainable.  After all, why should we pay for this through our taxes and fares?

Westminster has a huge amount of inequality and deprivation.  I would like to see schemes like this linking food banks, canal tow paths, schools of all types, F.E. colleges, fast food outlets, and council estates.  Not only the super- rich should benefit from this. 


The  modal filter would pay for the best scheme which I believe is option 3: a 2-way cycle lane in the centre.

 

I believe there also needs to be a lot more bike parking of all types dispersed along the route, particularly outside mansion blocks of flats.

AGM season

 There's a slew of share holder meetings taking place.

 

Here's what's going on in the Walt Disney company

 

https://pex.broadridge.com/getdocument.asp?doc=2C690293F3394460E06317289D0A41D5&type=edgar#3227270_2163728_2163801

 

 Unfortunately I missed the deadline to vote by 1 day!  I just have so much on this time of year to do with work.

Labour runner-up wishes to run as green candidate in Hendon

A former Labour Party member from Hendon who came 2nd in the selection has told me that he wishes to run in Hendon as a Green Party candidate.

 https://labourlist.org/2018/10/david-pinto-duschinsky-selected-as-new-labour-candidate-for-hendon/

He really did come 2nd: honest.

Letter to Hendon MP

 


Yesterday my local MP David wrote on twitter /x , "
Our welfare system is broken. We have a moral duty to reform it, putting work at its very heart. Everyone who can work deserves the security, dignity and agency that employment provides. That’s why we formed the Get Britain Working Group. And that’s why I, and dozens of Labour colleagues, have written to Liz Kendall today to support the Government’s argument for reform
"

 
my reaction.

Dear David Pinto-Duschinsky,

I read your letter to Liz Kendall with interest, the so called get Britain working group.

The response online has really been something:

Who is the chair of the group?

Who are its members?

To whom is it accountable?

Will it consider the needs of people with long-term psychiatric problems, such as schizophrenia, who may not be able to work?
 I also saw a question in reply to your social media (Elon twitter) post: How many (what proportion of) disabled members of staff does your backbench group of MPs employ?

I read from Exeter Green Party that you are refusing to tax the super-rich: is this true? If so I would urge you to listen to the compass group of Labour campaigners urging the Parliamentary Labour Party to stop trying to appeal to the far right Reform UK Ltd. and to appeal to green party voters instead: The Green party came 2nd in many seats, and have as many seats as Reform UK Ltd..

Following yesterday's backing of scapegoating of disabled people for the failings of the DWP, there have been calls for you to be voted out at the next general election. Looking at the letter itself, you've got Labour's mission wrong. The Labour Party was built and put into power in order to give a voice to the working class. If you take for instance your own selection that is a pattern that Labour has seen in every selection: a workers representative beaten by a middle-class party electorate in favour of a professional or non-blue-collar person as prospective parliamentary candidate. That is Labour failing at its mission, failing to back those living in social housing or council housing. Those colleagues that look after these estates and do the work such as pest control technicians are being pushed down and oppressed by a manager class: the boards of directors of these social housing associations. If I believed you were any better that a Conservative MP I would urge you to meet with SHAC - the social housing action committee - to try and resolve the dispute at Livv, which I understand has just failed at ACAS. It's every day workers like these, or like bus drivers, who politicians should stand with, to offer something better than other parties.

I am justifiably angry: I myself was not in employment, education, or training until I went back to school at the age of 25. The opportunities I had then are being cut, while the starting salaries for young people are not keeping up with the cost of living in Hendon. I speak to people who are suffering from long covid who say that covid is still happening and it is chronic in the working age population. You could be doing a lot more to prevent this suffering. When the next pandemic hits, our NHS and care sector should be prepared. It should have more sick pay, sick leave for all, work-from-home as a right, and proper health & safety precautions at work and on buses and tubes such as good masks, ventilation, and staying at home when pupils or staff are infectious. In the last few years inequality has massively increased: The fact that the richest man in the world has lost hundreds of billions and is still a billionaire shows that billionaires should not exist. So why are you punishing disabled people (like Guardian columnist Frances Ryan) for the sake of self-imposed fiscal rules and what Labour calls the non-dom community?

I really expect better from you. the "get Britain working" slogan is reminiscent of the lie from the darkest moment in European history, and you have constituents with disabilities including mental health issues; I've constantly asked you to listen to that and do better.

Yours sincerely,

Ben Samuel

faith and peace walk

 Last year I joined in with the faith and peace walk which took place on clean air day.  We walked with barnet multi faith forum around places of worship: churches, a synagogue, an islamic centre.

The next one will be on Thursday 19 June, clean air day.  As usual it will be part of the London Festival of Architecture and the event has some funding (refreshments were provided at each stop)

 This year 2025 will take place in New Barnet / East Barnet / High Barnet.

 For older less mobile members of the community there will be accessibility designed into the event.

development for development's sake

 A comment on nextdoor opening with "Not sure Barnet council is listening about the development in Edgware, Finchley and various parts of the Borough" has questioned if we have the infrastructure, naming hospital capacity, tubes, schools and mental health.  She asked if maybe it would be more useful in The North.

The comment drew 57 comments in 1 day including the suggestion to send a delegation (or deputation) to speak to the council, something we've seen by Anuta Zack a leading landlord in Edgware.

 The Council said it will not comment on specific plans which are being considered right now, as they look at the Barnet Plan, which was finalised and approved last week.

In conversation with local champions, I have heard a rumour that the Barnet Plan weakens the language around NCIL (Community Infrastructure Levy) saying it is optional which is not good for community.  The popular "brews & views" cafe was built from these contributions.